Today was the day I pulled the trigger and ordered a new studio computer and the newest ProTools software and interface! It coincidentally was the day that my website was completed. I think fate works in strange ways. I have to give a shout out to the great tech support and sales staff at Sweetwater. I highly recommend them. Lifetime tech support. That's what I'm talking about!!! And they mean it too. I surely have gotten my money's worth over the years. I can't wait to get my new toys!!
check out the website (designed by Ken Krauss) at: http://givingvoicestudio.com/
Friday, April 8, 2011
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Several Books Moving Through
I'm grateful to report that I have had several books moving through my studio lately. I just finished one called "Alcohol" in a Chelsea House Series called Understanding Drugs. It will be available for purchase on Audible soon.
Now I am working on "Curiosity Kills" by Linda Roberts for Books In Motion. It is a mystery novel set in Butte, Montana about mysterious happenings around an old copper mine. Look for that one at Booksinmotion.com in coming months.
Next in the lineup is what looks like a really interesting read: "Medicine in Translation, Journeys with My Patients" by Danielle Ofri. She is a doctor working at Bellevue in NYC. She works with people really living on the edge of society, including patients in the Survivors of Torture program. Gritty stuff. Very compelling. This one is for University Press Audiobooks.
Now I am working on "Curiosity Kills" by Linda Roberts for Books In Motion. It is a mystery novel set in Butte, Montana about mysterious happenings around an old copper mine. Look for that one at Booksinmotion.com in coming months.
Next in the lineup is what looks like a really interesting read: "Medicine in Translation, Journeys with My Patients" by Danielle Ofri. She is a doctor working at Bellevue in NYC. She works with people really living on the edge of society, including patients in the Survivors of Torture program. Gritty stuff. Very compelling. This one is for University Press Audiobooks.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
New Studio Up and Running
I finally have my new studio up and running and sounding good. Moving studios is a big deal, but it was a good move. The last studio sort of evolved by solving a series of problems as the arose. This time I was able to put all I have learned in the past 6 years into the design. It's funny how many annoying little things I lived with for years--cords that were in the way, or having the hook for my headphones JUST barely out of reach. Really--what was I thinking?
In any event, it is great to have this studio put together with all these things in mind. I feel so comfortable now. I sent off a sound sample to Myles at Books in Motion so he could re-do his presets for me for post production on my programs. I'm curious to hear from him how different the sound quality is. I feel like it is better. I hope that is the case.
Next up is a book on Alcohol for the Chelsea House. I've also done some post production for University Press this week. It is nice to be back at work.
In any event, it is great to have this studio put together with all these things in mind. I feel so comfortable now. I sent off a sound sample to Myles at Books in Motion so he could re-do his presets for me for post production on my programs. I'm curious to hear from him how different the sound quality is. I feel like it is better. I hope that is the case.
Next up is a book on Alcohol for the Chelsea House. I've also done some post production for University Press this week. It is nice to be back at work.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Good to have my voice back!
I have been without my instrument for over a week now. Pretty scary. I never felt that sick, just a little puffy in my throat, and then my voice just went. I mean gone. Nothing. Nada. Scary.
Today I am almost back to normal. I've started a new book for Books In Motion, "Revenge For Old Times Sake," by Chris Neri. Very funny stuff. This book seems to want to come out in my voice. Props to the author. It is a first person narrative, which makes it fun, and the protagonist is a smart alecky whip. After the last book it is nice to turn to something light and fun.
I need to wait to finish the final fixes on "Love in Condition Yellow." I am afraid that my voice might not match if I try to do it too soon. The final pages of that book were so moving that I kept having to do new takes because I kept getting choked up. I want the listeners to be choked up, NOT ME!! I am afraid to listen too closely to it for fear of beating myself up. I really think it is a wonderful book, and an important one. I hope I did it justice. It should be available soon on audible.com.
Today I am almost back to normal. I've started a new book for Books In Motion, "Revenge For Old Times Sake," by Chris Neri. Very funny stuff. This book seems to want to come out in my voice. Props to the author. It is a first person narrative, which makes it fun, and the protagonist is a smart alecky whip. After the last book it is nice to turn to something light and fun.
I need to wait to finish the final fixes on "Love in Condition Yellow." I am afraid that my voice might not match if I try to do it too soon. The final pages of that book were so moving that I kept having to do new takes because I kept getting choked up. I want the listeners to be choked up, NOT ME!! I am afraid to listen too closely to it for fear of beating myself up. I really think it is a wonderful book, and an important one. I hope I did it justice. It should be available soon on audible.com.
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Go to The Source Whenever Possible
I am about half way through "Love in Condition Yellow" and I finally sent the author an email to verify a few pronunciations. I'm so glad I did because it was a good reminder that pronunciation is very idiomatic and it can be important to telling a story in an authentic way. The way we handle language conveys to our listeners whether or not we are qualified to tell the story; are we trustworthy?
I ended up having a short phone conversation with her because she said the pronunciation of her name was a little tricky. Interesting. I thought for sure I had it correct, and was just checking in order to be thorough. Turns out it was a little bit different than any of the possible pronunciations I had considered, AND it was important to the author that I get it right. Her name is Rayday, and I thought it would be RAY-day, with slightly more emphasis on the 1st syllable. Either that, or ruh-DAY with a shwa in 1st syllable and the emphasis on the 2nd. In fact it is something between rah-DAY and ruh-DAY, a distinction not easily conveyed in writing. Okay. Guess I'll have to go fix that!
She was quite appreciative of the opportunity to help me get it right. After all the story is her baby; it's her blood, sweat, tears, and vulnerability all over the page. And then I come in, having the power to make a permanent recording of it with her name pronounced WRONG? That would be an injury that would be difficult to undo once it hit the market.
She told me that one of her essays had been read for a podcast and the reader clearly didn't know anything about guns or ammo and read the words "hollow point" (describing a type of bullet) with an odd emphasis which made it clear she was not familiar with the terminology. There's that trust thing. Credibility blown. I know I can't get everything perfect, but I would really like to avoid a mistake, an injustice really, like that.
How do you pronounce Iraq?? Now, I have heard eye-RACK and ih-RACK and ih-ROCK. Which is it? Well, that depends on who you're talking to. And I don't know about you, but to me it seems like there are some demographic lines drawn around these pronunciations. George Bush was fond of eye-RACK or even EYE-RACK if he was feeling particularly expressive. But then again, GB also said NOO-kyu-ler and I can't get anywhere close to that pronunciation out of the word nuclear. Supposedly it made him seem more like a "common man." Really? I'm not sure I want a common man leading my country. Anyway, back to the Iraq question. Academic types tend toward ih-ROCK. But I hear lots of folks use ih-RACK. I chose the latter. It turns out the author says ih-ROCK, but she doesn't have any objection to my pronunciation. Good. This stuff is not as simple as it may at first seem. I have learned that I can NEVER take anything for granted. That doesn't mean I can check every word I say, but I do think it is good to keep humility in mind as we go forward in this life.
I ended up having a short phone conversation with her because she said the pronunciation of her name was a little tricky. Interesting. I thought for sure I had it correct, and was just checking in order to be thorough. Turns out it was a little bit different than any of the possible pronunciations I had considered, AND it was important to the author that I get it right. Her name is Rayday, and I thought it would be RAY-day, with slightly more emphasis on the 1st syllable. Either that, or ruh-DAY with a shwa in 1st syllable and the emphasis on the 2nd. In fact it is something between rah-DAY and ruh-DAY, a distinction not easily conveyed in writing. Okay. Guess I'll have to go fix that!
She was quite appreciative of the opportunity to help me get it right. After all the story is her baby; it's her blood, sweat, tears, and vulnerability all over the page. And then I come in, having the power to make a permanent recording of it with her name pronounced WRONG? That would be an injury that would be difficult to undo once it hit the market.
She told me that one of her essays had been read for a podcast and the reader clearly didn't know anything about guns or ammo and read the words "hollow point" (describing a type of bullet) with an odd emphasis which made it clear she was not familiar with the terminology. There's that trust thing. Credibility blown. I know I can't get everything perfect, but I would really like to avoid a mistake, an injustice really, like that.
How do you pronounce Iraq?? Now, I have heard eye-RACK and ih-RACK and ih-ROCK. Which is it? Well, that depends on who you're talking to. And I don't know about you, but to me it seems like there are some demographic lines drawn around these pronunciations. George Bush was fond of eye-RACK or even EYE-RACK if he was feeling particularly expressive. But then again, GB also said NOO-kyu-ler and I can't get anywhere close to that pronunciation out of the word nuclear. Supposedly it made him seem more like a "common man." Really? I'm not sure I want a common man leading my country. Anyway, back to the Iraq question. Academic types tend toward ih-ROCK. But I hear lots of folks use ih-RACK. I chose the latter. It turns out the author says ih-ROCK, but she doesn't have any objection to my pronunciation. Good. This stuff is not as simple as it may at first seem. I have learned that I can NEVER take anything for granted. That doesn't mean I can check every word I say, but I do think it is good to keep humility in mind as we go forward in this life.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
The Proof is in....Somebody Else's Hands
One of the jobs I did when I first started in the audiobook industry was proofing: listening to the recording while reading along. It is an interesting job, which calls on a very specific and sometimes peculiar set of skills. It is very easy to become entranced by the story and lose focus on the task--to find errors. The eye and the brain don't always work together the way they should. This is true for both the narrator and the proofer, so you can see how this could get complicated.
The eye or the brain makes a decision about what it thinks a word is, without really seeing it. Sometimes crazy words that are not even in the script will pop up in the recording and you think (arrogantly and judgmentally), "What were they thinking?" Or you are listening and following along in the script and your eye and brain seem to agree with what the narrator is saying, but something seems wrong somewhere in your gut or the back of your neck, so you stop and rewind and go over it again and sure enough there was a mistake!
The thing I learned, which was eye opening and comforting at the same time, was that everybody makes mistakes--crazy mistakes. I was listening to people at the top of the industry--Simon Vance, Steven Rudniki, Barrett Whitener, Bernadette Dunne etc. And even they make some crazy mistakes. And now that I know more, I understand just how few mistakes they actually make, and how good they are!! When I started to record myself, I was horrified at the proofing notes that came back on my programs! I was so careful! How is it possible I made 5 errors on that one page?! I have learned to be humble, do the best I can, and just expect to make corrections; It is part of the process.
And I know not to try to work for too long a period without taking a break. I can assure you that the 5 mistakes on a single page happened after 3 hours of continuous reading. It is important to give the eye and brain a break even if the voice is holding strong.
The eye or the brain makes a decision about what it thinks a word is, without really seeing it. Sometimes crazy words that are not even in the script will pop up in the recording and you think (arrogantly and judgmentally), "What were they thinking?" Or you are listening and following along in the script and your eye and brain seem to agree with what the narrator is saying, but something seems wrong somewhere in your gut or the back of your neck, so you stop and rewind and go over it again and sure enough there was a mistake!
The thing I learned, which was eye opening and comforting at the same time, was that everybody makes mistakes--crazy mistakes. I was listening to people at the top of the industry--Simon Vance, Steven Rudniki, Barrett Whitener, Bernadette Dunne etc. And even they make some crazy mistakes. And now that I know more, I understand just how few mistakes they actually make, and how good they are!! When I started to record myself, I was horrified at the proofing notes that came back on my programs! I was so careful! How is it possible I made 5 errors on that one page?! I have learned to be humble, do the best I can, and just expect to make corrections; It is part of the process.
And I know not to try to work for too long a period without taking a break. I can assure you that the 5 mistakes on a single page happened after 3 hours of continuous reading. It is important to give the eye and brain a break even if the voice is holding strong.
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Killer Hang Nail!!
I am taking a break from editing, and typing this hunt and peck style because I have an insanely painful hang nail on my little finger. It is ridiculous; you'd think it was a gunshot wound! How can one tiny place on the body generate such intense pain?
Finished up the final work on 3 programs for Chelsea House today: Pope John Paul II, Civil War Leaders, and The Stock Market Crash of 1929. There was not a lot to do. The narrators turned in really clean work. I really appreciate that, and try to do the same when I am reading.
I will spend some time recording "Love in Condition Yellow" before I have to break to get Ivy from school, take her to her voice lesson, and then get to the theater for our Pay-What-You-Can community service performance of "Sweetest Swing"---Ah yes, the show must go on!! Hang nail or no!
Finished up the final work on 3 programs for Chelsea House today: Pope John Paul II, Civil War Leaders, and The Stock Market Crash of 1929. There was not a lot to do. The narrators turned in really clean work. I really appreciate that, and try to do the same when I am reading.
I will spend some time recording "Love in Condition Yellow" before I have to break to get Ivy from school, take her to her voice lesson, and then get to the theater for our Pay-What-You-Can community service performance of "Sweetest Swing"---Ah yes, the show must go on!! Hang nail or no!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)